Anne Ashworth, Property Editor Analysis
Download 'Too Hot', an exclusive Specials track from iTunes
The introduction of a new council tax band for homes worth £1 million plus would be a highly lucrative proposition for the Exchequer, thanks to the boom in the housing market. This has deprived the £1 million-plus pad of much of its value, but not all of its glamour.
The assumption that wealth is needed to buy such a property still applies. After all, anyone seeking to buy a £1 million house would still require a substantial six-figure income, even with a deposit of £100,000 and a generous mortgage lender.
There are many accidental occupants of homes that now have seven-figure values. They would have bought the houses for modest sums three or more decades ago and likely be living on smallish occupational pensions. They would be most indignant at the prospect of a £2,000 increase in their council tax bill. If a new rate band is imposed, expect to see a mass movement of pensioner council tax refuseniks.
The Treasury is more likely to focus on the greater number of homes that could be liable for a higher band of council tax. Like the rest of us, White-hall mandarins pore over reports of homes in Kensington, West London, that are put on the market for £12 million and sell for £15 million, after a sealed bid auction. This suggests there is a breed of super-rich who should be paying more for local services.
Since 1991, when council tax bands were set, there has been a threefold increase in the price of the average home, from about £67,000 to £200,000. Real estate in the most sought-after London postcodes of Chel-sea and Notting Hill has outpaced the mean, showing gains of 30 to 40 per cent last year. This has given prime real estate in Central London an average price of £1.1 million.
But the £1 million-plus house is not purely a metropolitan phenomenon, as Land Registry figures show. Last November, for example, 457 houses worth seven figures were sold; but only about half of those (236) were in London. The capital did account for 55 of the 77 £2 million-plus transactions in the month. The Land Registry said that the number of houses sold for more than £1 million had increased by 31 per cent on the previous year.
A recent survey of the 20 most expensive streets in England and Wales showed that £1 million homes were widespread, if not commonplace. Streets cited in the study included Park Avenue in South Harpenden (where the average value of homes is £1.8 million), Western Avenue in Poole (£1.5 million), Roman Grange in Sutton Coldfield (£1.2 million), and Sandmoor Drive in Leeds (£1 million).
This year, fewer properties may move into the £1 million bracket as higher interest rates costs dampen the market’s exuberant mood. The most optimistic observers predict that prices will grow by 7 per cent; the rest think that gains will be limited to 4 per cent.
A limited supply of properties for sale in some areas should continue to propel prices upwards in these locations, which will presumably push up the values used for the assessment of council tax bills.
Lenders continue to use tight criteria to decide who will — and will not — qualify for a home loan, so follow these tips
The six-bedroom, Grade II-listed Balcony House in Cambridgeshire is just the job for couples who need their own space
The actor and writer recalls five happy years on a barge in Chelsea – as bohemian as you’d expect for a former Young One
Reinvent your back garden as a stylish entertaining space – with hammocks, hanging lanterns and the boy’s-own barbecue
Win a luxury weekend to Newcastle and its neighbour Gateshead, find out more here
Risk, resilience and embracing new technology
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
Discover the power of collective thinking. Submit a solution and be in with a chance to win a Media Hub Home Entertainment System
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip
Make the most of the summer and enter our fabulous photographic competition, you could win a £5000 holiday
Corsica is an island of beauty and contrast, an ideal holiday destination
Enjoy further reading from Travel to Fashion, Business to Sport, discover more




|
|
|
|
|
|
Sign up today or try one of our free demo crosswords
Essential reading whether you're buying, selling, improving or moving
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
The clever way to lease a new car is with Car leasing made simple™
2009
per month on 36-month
Personal Contract Hire (PCH)
2008
42850
Car Insurance
£24,250 - £30,346
MI5
London
£60,000
The Environment Agency
Bristol
Up to £90K
Boots
Midlands
OTE £85k
Credit Protection Association
Nationwide Opportunities
Completely London
Luxury Condo's in Manhattan with NYC views
The best new homes in Wimbledon?
Nationwide
Fabulous Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers Including Virgin Atlantic Flights Prices Start From Only £699pp!
Last Minute Cruise And Cruise & Stay Offers. Med From £499pp, Caribbean From £699pp!
5 star quality at a 3 star price.
8 fabulous Canadian cities ...you won’t find cheaper
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths | Subscriptions | E-paper
News International associated websites: Globrix Property Search | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2009 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
I really cannot believe after all these years.I still get the belief that the wealthy still want the Poll tax after all these years.It is simple why the people protested.The working people with a family paid the same as a say a millionaire.Still,both rich against working people still cannot see the difference. I put this down to greed and I accuse most rich people of having enough money in their bank accounts and still wanting more even if they have enough.I do not belong to any of the markist group and just a person of the United Kingdom. The rich are still paying less because the top band has hardly move since the Council tax was introduce. Get your head out of the sand and see what the working people with families would be paying now in 2007.There is fairness and unfairness and still some people cannot see the unfairness of the Poll Tax.It is about how much money that goes in a bank account and never thinks about the next person.Some must love money.
Philip Stephen Pollard, Hull., United Kingdom
In response to Tom - what do people who dont own their own home pay? I have always said that charging (people who rent) on the value of a property who someone else benefits from is not right. That is why an income based tax is fairer. I agree with Judy - if you own an expensive home you surely have the means to upkeep. Whats the big deal about home ownership anyway.........it is a government ploy to keep house prices high so they can ease in lots of taxes based on house "values".
Scrap the council tax and scrap Buy to Let and let everyone have the chance to have a decent, affordable home.
Annie, aberdeen, scotland
We are retired, self made totally and live in a pleasant house in Surrey UK, worth not far off £1m. We educated our kids privately ( the largest expenditure from the council tax), have no road costs ( ours is a private road) and never see a policeman . We can now look forward to fortnightly rubbish collection as well. Why should we be penalised again fand again for being independent and self sufficient ?
We already support a useless absent Surrey police force, a lousy Surrey state education system and myriads of the feckless underclass who look like Vicki Pollard and behave like the Royle family ( Go into Guildford on a Saturday !).
The poll tax was the fairest tax but was used to destroy Maggie, by her enemies. The super rich (eg the Blairs will be, in Connaught Square) and the well paid Chief Exec of Surrey County Council (£220,000 p.a) will not notice a couple of thousands more off their enormous packages. We and others will be crucified by this state fascism.
Mike, Leatherhead, England
It is a shame if people have small occupational pensions living in £1 million houses, although I doubt there will be many of those. How would you maintain a property of £1million witha modest pension for a start? No it is more likely that people in huge houses have huge pensions to go with it and so...pay up!
judy, liverpool, england
I think that the Council Tax should be replaced by highre rate of Income Tax as Council Tax is very unfair to the OAP's, who have only fixed and small pension to live on.
By raising the Income Tax Rate from 40% to may be 50%-60% range will jusify all concerned.
Dhiren Shah, Wembley, United Kingdom
I own a house in a town in California where the property tax system is, I think, fairer. The tax is 1.5% of the purchase price of your home, capped at $1.5m - i.e. if you buy a house at, say, $5m you pay 1.5% of 'only' $1.5m. Your house is never revalued for the purposes of taxation so living in it long term you know what you will be due to pay for the rest of your time there, with one proviso - the council may (and does) increase your property value year on year by no more than 2%. This is simple and fair - the price you pay for your home determines the property tax.
tom moncrieff, london, england
The problem that is coming into sharp focus is the serious lack of retirement income of many people in the UK. As a country, we have failed to think this through and take action and now there are a lot of people in asset rich, cash poor situations. Selling up is the obvious answer, though some will inevitably resent it when they find the true value of their house is not as much as they hoped. Older people need to live in properties they can manage that are near shops, banks, churches, public transport and so on so that when they can't drive (and the rules on this will be tightened) they are not trapped in their homes. A large house in the outer suburbs or the country is not really the best place in your old age.
colin, Shrewsbury UK,
I only have one income on which I already pay two taxes: income tax and National Insurance. I'm certainly not going to pay a third. There needs to be a radical look at the services councils provide: are all of them really necessary or are we just being fleeced to provide the ever-expanding empires of councillors and bureaucrats? Councils should only provide services where they are really necessary and these should be paid for by a combination of direct charges: if you use them you pay and a local sales tax, which would encourange councils to think about the effect excessive taxes would have on their area. Councillors' expenses should be drastically cut back; pensions should be paid for by employees not by the rest of us and there should certainly be a freeze on further recruitment. Certainly, if this - or any government - goes ahead with this revaluation, they can forget about my vote and I suspect I won't be alone.
Carroll Powell, London,
Many of these pentioners would move very happily, into easier managed and adapted accomodation.
Has anyone who thinks up this twaddle ever been involved in trying to downsize property, particularly when due to age and/or disability?
You are seen as prey by estate agents and developers a good offer is 'market value' LESS 20%. We recently had a 'door knocker' make an offer on this basis only to reduce it by £35k after 7 weeks of mucking around.
Before anyone says anything about 'reputable' agents when we checked with them their clients offer was £30k below that of the 'door knocker's' drop close....
Finding somewhere to buy causes more problems - ever tried getting an estate agent interested in selling a 'good' property if they aren't going to make comission on selling the mortgage? Cash buyers are not really welcome.
'There's a lot of charities that will help' people say - no there aren't, they just don't want to know AND Social services just want to sell the house to 'fund care'.
JON SKRINE, Cardiff, Wales UK
Any new tax affects somebody. The article says that there are modest pensioners who bought a house a while back which is now worth £1m and then cites only a few streets and areas in the entire country where the average house is worth £1m. I doubt there's any "modest" pensioner sitting in a £1m house, and if they are, then please sell up, move in to a small flat and enjoy the rest of your life.
I don't understand PR's comments that taxing on income is the only fair council tax. Surely, taxing based on the council services that you use is the only fair tax.
Just over 3 years ago, I was earning £100k per year and renting a studio flat in Wimbledon in a £900,000 house owned by a pensioner. I had a great income but little capital. Why should somebody with great capital but no income be subsidised by me?
JD, Wimbledon, UK
There is a simple solution for the asset-rich, cash-poor section of pensioners: assets have a cash value and a particularly high one at the moment due to sustained asset-price inflation, so just sell your assets. It's an obvious solution yet one that no-one seems willing to suggest to pensioners.
I understand that homes have a sentimental value but younger generations should be given a chance too. They need to start families and sentimental memories of their own and they shouldn't be held back from that by a generation of unusually long-lived pensioners sitting on piles of cash they can neither afford to maintain nor pay tax on.
MB, Scotland,
The population have a choice:keep Labour out by voting Conservative in May.
Michael Rigby, Blackburn, England
Bring back the old rating system. Small house = small bill. Big house = big bill. Mansion = huge bill. etc.
Double the bill for those owning second homes (our homes owned by companies).
Isobel, York, UK
The bottom line for this cursed govt is to rake in £££££, in any which way and any which means.
What has logic or morals got to do with anything they do.
When is Voting Day?
P Stewart, Kent, UK
This approach will force the majority os us, the pensioners of this country, into battery hen style accomodation to live out our now useless lives!
WHAT A DISGRACE!!
When will the ability to pay be reflected in the Council Tax charges?
Jim Golightly, Prudhoe, England
A tax related to income is the only fair solution.
Robert, Amersham, UK
This article reinforces the principle that the only fair way to raise local taxes is according to income - and we already have the systems to do that. Even the poll tax was fairer than this property tax, where people who have lived in the same house for years are facing iniquitous tax rises. We also need ways of making councils more immediately accountable for their budgets - not just one vote every 5 years to choose between parties who will all raise as much tax as they can get away with.
PR, Cornwall,
Isn't this an example (and there's loads of them) of the stupidity and cowardice of government. Just as with 'the fight against drugs' the issue is driven by anticipated media coverage not intelligence. Intelligence being defined as the ability to solve problems.
Councils need more money, if only to fund their pension black hole. A local income tax is the obvious solution collected via the Inland Revenue. You don't need any more people you just reflect the individual's residence in the tax code and the money is transferred to the council's coffers. It only requires a few software changes. I do realise that HMRC stuggle with that but even then it's a one-off.
But Brown has exchanged equity for stealth and the title of a modern-day Sheriff of Nottingham all because of media response to the words 'income tax'. Pitiful.
eddie reader, birmingham, uk
Replace council tax with something simpler and more equitable. Income Tax.
Tom Farrier, Weybridge, UK
This tax is totally out of control.
Some pensioners will probably be asked to sign over their homes if they can not afford this unjust tax which takes no account of the owners ability to pay.
Indeed with continual annual increases it is only a matter of time before more and more people are forced to surrender the very homes they have paid high taxes to acheive.
Bernard Parke, GUILDFORD,
many pensioners living in private housing just above the council tax relief given to those on state benefit are ending up worse off than these people in receipt of same and can indeed end up worse off than some people that have hardly worked at all in their lifetime
richard clissold, cardiff,