David Green
Win one of ten pairs of tickets to the London Double Header
Should we believe the crime figures? Confidence in the Government is now so low that few people are prepared to take any official figures on trust. If it were true that police recorded crime really had fallen by 9per cent and crime measured by the British Crime Survey really was down by a tenth, the Government would deserve a little praise.
But it is not just a question of trust. By increasing the prison population the Government has been doing the right thing. However, it feels rather shame-faced about that increase and rarely makes the connection between lower crime and more prisoners. But there are two reasons why increasing the prison population will reduce crime - incapacitation and deterrence. First, prison incapacitates offenders. When they are in jail they can't break into your house, steal your car or stab your teenage son. Secondly, if word gets around among criminals that there is a bigger risk of going to jail, it has a deterrent effect. The more certain the chances of punishment, the more criminals will think twice.
When Tony Blair took office in 1997 there were about 61,000 criminals in jail. The latest figure is 83,575. How many crimes would have been committed if those 22,000 additional offenders had been at large?
The best evidence comes from a Home Office survey in 2000. Offenders about to start a prison sentence were asked how many crimes they had committed in the previous 12 months. The average was 140 crimes a year and, for those on drugs, 257. The Government has been trying to limit prison to the most serious offenders and we know that the majority of prison inmates have a drug or alcohol problem. The average today is, therefore, likely to be nearer 257 crimes than 140.
If we take the lower figure, incapacitating 22,000 criminals who would have committed 140 crimes a year prevents more than three million crimes. If they were all drug users the figure would exceed five million.
Could the increase in the prison population from 2006-07 to 2007-08 explain the fall in crime over the same period? Police-recorded crime fell by 476,900 offences.
Between April 2007 and April 2008 the prison population increased by 1,843. If the annual offending rate was 140, then 258,000 crimes would have been prevented. If the additional prisoners were all serious offenders, as the Government claims, then 473,000 crimes would have been prevented.
Sheer coincidence? Despite its bashfulness about prison, the Government plainly does not think so. It plans to increase prison capacity to 96,000 by 2014, despite the squeamishness of Lord Hurd of Westwell in a letter to The Times yesterday.
When he was Home Secretary from 1985 to October 1989, Lord Hurd set out to reduce the prison population and presided over one of the most rapid increases in crime yet. There were 46,800 prisoners in 1985 rising to 50,000 in 1988 as judges responded to the crime wave. Instead of backing the judges, Lord Hurd cut the prison population so that it fell to 45,600 soon after he left.
Crime under the British Crime Survey rose from 12.4 million offences in 1985 to more than 14 million in 1989, and police records show an increase from 3.6 million in 1985 to 4.5 million in 1990. Some people never learn.
The Government has lost confidence in itself to such an extent that it does not know how to claim credit for an effective policy when it has one. It should be shouting aloud that “prison works”. Instead it talks of releasing prisoners early, puts pressure on judges to hand down lenient sentences and acts as if it thinks that criminals prepared to stick a knife in someone will be deterred by a visit to the local A&E.
But what about those crime figures? Should we find the 10 per cent fall reassuring? Crime is historically high at about ten times the rate in the 1950s. True, during the 1990s it got up to about 12 times the 1950s figure. A fall is a fall, but we have still got a long way to go and not just by comparison with more than 50 years ago.
Police records throughout Europe reveal that England and Wales had the second-highest crime rate out of the 37 countries in the 2006 European Sourcebook of Crime, compiled by an international team (including the Home Office) under the auspices of the Council of Europe. In 2003, at 11,241 crimes per 100,000 population, our rate was more than double the average of 4,736.
Moreover, the Government does not really believe its own figures. Today's crime figures mention that 2.7 million fraudulent transactions were recorded on UK-issued cards in 2007, an increase of a fifth in one year, according to the organisation that handles payments. But how much fraud appears in police figures?
Total fraud and forgery was down by 22 per from 199,700 in 2006-07 to 155,400 in 2007-08. The more you look into the figures the more one doubts them. But they are the best we have and should not diminish the credit due to the Government for pursuing a policy of “prison works”.
David Green is the director of the think-tank Civitas
Read the training tips and advice that helped our London Triathletes
Enjoy screenings of all the classic films you love, plus take advantage of two-for-one tickets
Times Online's new TV show helps you make the right decisions for your pet
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
The latest travel news plus the best hotels and gadgets for business travellers
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles


Why good girls pay good money for bad-girl baubles

Search The Times Births, Marriages & Deaths
2007
£47,995
2008
£42,945
06/2006
£40,850
Great car insurance deals online
£33,000
Macmillan Cancer Support
Central/South West
£50k
NHS
Nationwide
£
£30k OTE
Meltwater News
Nationwide
circa £70k
Central Office of Information
London
Great Dubai Investment Opportunities
from £89,950
The Finest Luxury Homes In London and the SE
From £995,000
Studios £33K, 1 Beds £60K, 2 beds £79K
Great Investment, River Views
New York Christmas Shopping
Christmas Cruises
From only £995pp
APTs East Coast now from only
£2425pp.
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times. Globrix Property Search - find property for sale and rent in the UK. Visit our classified services and find jobs, used cars, property or holidays. Use our dating service, read our births, marriages and deaths announcements, or place your advertisement.
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
The major flaw in the above argument is that prisoners have to be released. It is clear to all that prison does not effectively prevent re-offending and thus the vast majority will go on to commit further offences. Prison is a temporary solution and very definitely not a deterrent.
Steve Higgins, Solicitor, Leeds,
At last some common sense. Punishment went out when Capital Punishment was abolished. How can you give a man
likeBiggs30yrs for robbery when average murder sentence is only 6-7yrs. all other sentences have had to be reduced in line and every reduction = increase in offences.
Frederick Gale , Fawley Hampshire, England
Jail acts to turn beginner crims to experts. So use flogging, or the old stocks where people throw rotten eggs and tomatoes for punishment. A bit of pain and embarrassment are good deterrents. And the death penalty for real baddies, get rid of 'em. Needs a good judicial system though.
David, Bathurst, Australia
Why shoud we believe any government stats, after all they tell us that inflation is running at well under 4% and who believs that.
terry, northampton, uk
This data is inconclusive. In principle locking up more people helps. However, it looks like violent crime, that should be punished with jail terms, is on the rise. This contradicts the principle so we must assume that most of the people in jail are for minor offences
andrea ceccanti, london,
What you say may be true but it is essentially facile in the sense of being an inevitable result, but it doesn t do anything for the prevalence of crime or for reducing the costs. I submit it is the threat of crime that bothers people as much as the event. A principal reason why Britain has its high rate of crime is because it has an autocratic and adversarial regime in contrast to the more socially democratic societies in Europe. Thus it is not so much a question of prison working as of prison being necessary given the environment. I would submit that one point to seriously consider is improving the state of housing in the country, which is presently relatively so poor. If a person comes out of jail to a secure and comfortable accommodation he is much more likely to be deterred from going back inside than if he is just thrown onto the streets and a hostel environment.
Henry Percy, London, UK
"Prison works. So why won't we admit it?"
Because short term reductions may lead to long-term increases.
Josh, London,
In addition to lessons from Singapore, consider those of Joe Arpaio. (Google him)
Joe (no relation), New York, US
What utter Twaddle! Libraries of properly conducted research amply demonstrat that tougher sentencing policies and greater use of incarceration actually correlates with an INCREASE in the crime rate.
John Lockett, Burnley, Lancashire
This article is a list of predictable provocative assertions dressed up in fancy language. No wonder people don't read the newspapers so much any more. If we want brash headlines we go to the BBC. If we want to relax with something a bit more thoughtful, this piece, at least, is not providing it.
Tina, London, UK
Why, oh why are we following in the footsteps--in so many ways--as the dysfunctional U.S? Prisons are not the answer; a robust and comprehensive education for all is. An intelligent, well trained society is far more healthy and productive than one that is being dumbed down ala the good 'ole U.S.A.
Lindsey Murray, Lafayette (via Hertfordshire), U.S.
harsh policies DO work. look at NYC, they have one strike your out where if you are convicted of a serious crime you lose your state subsidized housing. of course the black community said it wasn't fair but now NYC is the safest it has ever been. 15 years for cold blooded murder is a farce!
Alex, london, england
Of course prison works in locking the criminal up-that's obvious.
The deterrent effect is debatable-if it was that much of a deterrent there would be almost no crime.
So crime has gone down but it is still much higher than in many EU countries-yet we lock up far more people than these countries.
Nick, Rochdale, United Kingdom
One wonders why Robert Mugabe is unable to secure absolute obedience from his population, where the fear-factor is dizzyingly high and the penalty for breaking the law exceeds any penalty in Britain 1000-fold. Clearly deterrence is not the major factor in law enforcement.
Steve, Cyprus,
Many of the people in prison at any time are on remand, and therefore innocent, and they should not be in prison. of those on remand, one third will be found 'not guilty', and another third will be given a non-custodial sentence.
many who are found guilty should be sent to hospital not prison.
Robert Jameson, Hartlepool, UK
it's just as easy to commit a crime inside a prison as outside one.
George, Basingstoke, UK
George Williams, Basingstoke, UK
if prison eliminates crime then why not just lock up the whole population and get rid of crime completely?
When you start with a faulty premise you end with a faulty conclusion.
david, new York, United States
lots of young kids dont see prison as that bad, in some places, most know someone, parent or friend whose been, they almost expect to go. I am in favour of tagging as they are overcrowded and they often come out with more criminal connections than when they went in, and much harder too.
madeline, nottingham,
How naive - people have given up reporting crime.The only time they bother is if they need a Crime Rererence Number for their Insurance Claim.
Do the figures include fixed penalty notices, cautions?
james allen, manchester, england
There was 1 Brazilian shot by the police in London. The same year 900 were shot in Rio. If you merged the two- how many ?
When you have worked that out If 100,000 from a state where 100in 1000 are murdered moved to a city of 1,000,000 where it is 1 in a 1000 what would the murder rate be?
ged, manchester,
Jo - Domestic abuse is not a political crime. There is nothing political about being kicked around a lounge whilst pregnant.
Most murders are domestic related which why it is taken so seriously
Bryony - To be fair there are many prosecutions for common assault, not just GBH, I'm involved in them.
Andrew, Notts, UK
I have just submitted this letter:
Every time I see the Government crime (or any other) statistics, I am reminded of Orwells words:
All one knew was that every quarter, astronomical quantities of boots were produced on paper, while perhaps half the population of Oceania went barefoot."
Peter Nicholson, London, UK
How many of those 22000 are people jailed for possessing drugs who have harmed no-one whatsoever?
Don't confuse people in jail with doing good - most of them are there as a consequence of drug prohibition anyway.
Frank, London,
No parole, no ridiculous 'early release' schemes and the adoption of '3 strikes and your out.' Just think about the reduction in crime that could be achieved. Law abiding members of society would be able to walk the streets without fear, if we kept the criminal locked up, even those under 18.
June, Manchester, UK
The government does not produce statistics for the illegal drug abuse now endemic within the UK and which underpins about 50% or more of criminal activity. Coupled with this has been a rapid expansion in the counterfeiting of fashion goods, entertainment items, Identity documents and pornography
robert El-Cid, Hull., East Yorks.,
You say prisons need to be a deterrent. Well they are not. I recently visited one in a work capacity and I tell you they are like Butlins. Nice equipped gym (costs me £40/month), games room free pool etc. TV in every room nice grounds all dressed in casual clothes. Deterrent? I want to go.
rob, ashbourne, uk
The decrease in crime appears to correspond with an increase in the prison population, the latter is not necessarily the cause of the former. In the United States, for example, a burgeoning prison population has not decreased crime. The governement has reduced crime by eliminating social problems.
Chris, Worcestershire,
Jo from London - how is domestic violence a political crime?
The only people who are ever prosecuted for domestic violence (the conviction rate is appalling) are those who have inflicted GBH and/or serious psychological damage to their partner - not exactly a 'silly argument'!
Unbeliveable.
Bryony, Leeds,
180 when hanging stopped over 800 now. Still not high. As many were killed in one NY precinct before they got a grip. Their rate is still higher.
In 50s prostitution was a social evil60s an intelligent career choice.Permissiveness caused increase, awareness of ill effects its slow decline.
ged, manchester,
There is too much focus on rehabilitation nowadays. I quite agree that it is a "nice to have", but it seems very elusive. Meanwhile, the essential job of minimizing crime is being neglected, and as this article shows, prison is an effective way of doing that. Sorry if that's too conservative a view!
Tom Welsh, Basingstoke,
Generally, crime follows unemployment, not incarceration. But since the UK has more prisoners per capita than anywhere else in Europe and still has more crime, perhaps prison by itself is not the answer? Certainly refsing to rehabilitate junkies doesn't help, nor does criminalizing the insane.
richard, Horley, UK
The US locks up 25% of the worlds prisoners and serious crime rates are far higher than here. Norway has half our prisoners and lower crime rates. UK prisons turn minor offenders into career criminals and often into heroin addicts.
Danny, Forth, Scotland
Yes prison works fine until they are released .
Benzo, Nr Chelmsford,
Let's just lock everyone up and then there'll be no crime at all.
Chris, Slough, UK
What was the murder and manslaughter rate in the last year that the death penalty was given, and what is it now? How many innocent people have lost their lives through that political change?
N Reed, Truro, UK
David,
Our problem today is that we have abandoned the truth of good and evil and have adopted instead what we now call values or in broader terms 'human rights'. Value is a subjective, relativistic term; any individual, group, or society may choose to value whatever they want. Very Bad!
Mark, Maidstone, England
Have anyone recently tried to report a crime to the Police? You can't due to a lack of staff on the front desk or an unwillingness of the staff if the front desk manned to file a report. No report, "no crime" and therefore the crime figures go down.
A crime in itself I think.
Andrew James, London, UK
So it wouldn't be anything to do with the 30,000 new 'crimes' invented by this Goverment since they took office or the areas of 'crime' which they have attacked, a huge swathe of which are aimed at the hapless motorist?? Present policy can make a crime out of a robust fart or writing poetry.
Pu Li, Phuket, Thailand
If this was treated as a serious problem and say the prison population was doubled. We could go on a campaign of serious sentences. Then we could with the pressure of overcrowding dealt with address the prisoners problems that make them likely to reoffend. Empty prisons is no problem.
John, Egremont,
Aggression and criminality were the norm for our stone-age forebears. Britain retained its share in the gene pool, when psychopaths were its warriors & knights. No surprise they do not firt in modern society. Lock 'em up where they can't hurt the rest of us. Build more prisons for anachronisms.
wilfred knight, orange county, usa
Prison serves two purposes. One is to punish, the second is to remove criminals from society.
The concept of the "three strikes" rule should be adopted by Britain, where committing three serious offences lands you true life in prison. The system deals with someones propensity to commit crime.
peterj, malvern, uk
David Ryan says that prison does not work as repeat offender rates seem pretty constant. In fact, this supports Green's claim that it works by keeping those repeat offenders behind bars longer. I would agree that it rarely if ever rehabilitates - that requires changes in deep-seated habit patterns.
Faustino, Brisbane, Australia
That's it completely, lack of confidence and complete mistrust. Juggled statistics would be expected just as further "band-aids" for serious problems on Law n' order, the military or Economy.
Brooks, C, Jomtien, Thailand
If we locked up proper criminals and stopped wasting our time on political crime like domestics we would have the whole thing under control.
Remanding a man who has had a silly argument with his girlfriend but bailing a prolific thief with a habit to support is a nonsense.
Jo, london, uk
Thank you, M G Graham, for your kind words. Yes, Singapore is very tough on criminals - but also has many rehabilitation services, both public and private.
The key point is this: the criminal must have a good reason to want rehabilitation. Which is exactly what the tough prison sentence provides.
Robert Firth, Singapore,
Any copper you can tell you crime "statistics" be shaped in any way desired simply through reporting policy. Remember an entire force beat the bushes to find the 700 "victims" of a teenagers scheme to cheat a quid from people? Result: 700 crimes reported, 700 crimes solved. A swindle itself!
Bob Evans, Anaheim, California
As so many crimes are commited by druggies, why do we not inject them with chemicals that make them throw up if they relapse? I remember some sort of a pilot years ago.
Desmond Taylor, Houston, USA TX
I don't know why Governments chase so hard the elusive grail of rehabilitation. It's not as if decent people are in short supply.
Paul Neri, Canberra, Australia
If prison doesn't work here's a thought .... how about we let them all out today and see if the crime rate falls? Duh!
M Graham, Auckland, New Zealand
So which is it? Does prison work as evidenced by more prisoners and falling crime rates? Or are the figures dodgy, meaning that actually crime isn't falling so locking up all those prisoners was a waste of time and money?
Can't have it both ways!
Simon, London,
Singapore is a great example of how to run prisons. They keep inmates 4 to a cell, feed them rice and water and let them share a single toilet bowl in the corner with only the privacy of their straw bed mats to screen them. Safest city in the world and a wonderful place to walk around at night!
M G Graham, Auckland, New Zealand
Putting criminals away is the right path. However when they get to prison they need to be made so uncomfortable in there, that they willl never want to return to such a place again. No TV, radio, telephone, cigarets, alcohol or girly magazines. No free time, only hard work. Make it hard all the way.
Jim Wills, Brisbane, Australia
While I have respect for the work of Civitas, I cannot agree with David Green's assessment. Recent criminology literature shows no direct correlation between the rise in prison sentences and declining crime rates, and repeat offender rates seem pretty constant. In this sense, prison does not work.
David Ryan, Birmingham, UK
If they rebuilt the asylums for the unfortunate mad people then maybe they could put criminals in the prisons instead of the mentally disturbed?
kevin, Lincoln, UK