You need Flash Player 8 or higher to view video content with the ROO Flash Player.
Click here to download and install it.
Win a fitness package worth more than £3,000

The greatest sin for a comic-book movie adaptation such as The Incredible Hulk is for it to be average. But this is more of a disheartened plod down the path of least resistance than the building-pummelling riot of ideas that it needed to be. The Hulk has already failed to ignite as a movie franchise. Ang Lee’s Hulk (2003), with its esoteric, sensitive approach, jarred with the primal joy of a pair of big green fists and a trail of devastation.
The approach in the new Hulk seems to be to avoid risks at all costs. The film is a generic trawl through well-worn scenes from other pictures. Chaos is yet again wrought in the streets of Manhattan. As in King Kong, a vulnerable woman is able to break through the brute rage of the monster and touch the sensitive soul within. Like the recent Iron Man, the protagonist is forced to do battle with his evil alter ego. Is there even a spark of freshness or originality in this tedious film? Well at one point Hulk tears a police car in half and fashions it into a pair of makeshift boxing gloves, but that’s about as far as it goes.
The cast is uneven. Tim Roth, as the “super soldier” Blonsky, snarls and spits his dialogue entertainingly, but Liv Tyler delivers her lines as if she’s recovering from a cranial trauma. Edward Norton, a decent actor, has the thankless role of Banner/the Hulk. He spends most of his time avoiding conflict and meditating studiously to keep his pulse down. But just as tensions begin to rise, his character morphs into a giant CGI lump of putty with an attitude problem. The CGI rendering of the Hulk in his full green glory is no more successful in this film than it was in the last – millions of dollars of computer software at their disposal and the best they can come up with is something that looks like angry Plasticine.
12A, 114 minutes
Industry sectors news at a glance. Interactive heatmap, video and podcast
The inside track on current trends in the charity, not for profit and social enterprise sectors
Read our exclusive 100 Years of Fleming and Bond interactive timeline, packed with original Times articles and reviews
Everything the Business Traveller needs to know to make a better trip

Find tickets for:
Shortcuts to help you find sections and articles
05/2005
£13,500
08/2008
£109,950
2006
£10,750
Great car insurance deals online
£Excellent+ executive benefits
Torres and Partners
London
£49,229 - £62,035 pro rata
Charity Commission
London/Liverpool/Taunton
Alstom Power
Europe
Six Figure
Rolls Royce
Midlands/Europe
From £89,950
Great Investment, River Views
Special Offers now available
At the new sophisticated
Encore Las Vegas Resort!
Cruise the Islands of Hawaii - Pride of America
List your property with two leading travel websites
Great travel insurance deals online
Contact our advertising team for advertising and sponsorship in Times Online, The Times and The Sunday Times, or place your advertisement.
Times Online Services: Dating | Jobs | Property Search | Used Cars | Holidays | Births, Marriages, Deaths
News International associated websites: Globrix | Property Finder | Milkround
Copyright 2008 Times Newspapers Ltd.
This service is provided on Times Newspapers' standard Terms and Conditions. Please read our Privacy Policy.To inquire about a licence to reproduce material from Times Online, The Times or The Sunday Times, click here.This website is published by a member of the News International Group. News International Limited, 1 Virginia St, London E98 1XY, is the holding company for the News International group and is registered in England No 81701. VAT number GB 243 8054 69.
Silly me, I didn't realize this was Stan Lee's interpretation of Romeo and Juliet. This movie delivers exactly what it's audience wants. Hulk smash puny critic. Long live Stan Lee!
Mike, Irvine, USA
The reviewer is obiously not the target film audience. If you were a fan of the 70's show or the comic, then this movie kicks butt! If you're not in that group, then SPider-Man. The movie is geared towards the "in the know" crowd and does not water anything down for the general audience.
Mike, Montreal,
And to all the negative reviewers out there... grow up...The Hulk is a Marvel comic character...not to be confused with "The Godfather" or "Titanic".
Mike, Montreal,
Im sorry did u think ang lee's version was deep? or are u just riding on the bandwagon? The 2008 Hulk was a magnificent comeback.Comparing it to Iron man?how dare thee..the story goes back decades so have it out with Stan Lee I question wethere you actually watched the film at all:)
Lan, Stow,
Harsh review. In comparison to the Ang Lee film, this is a more rounded 'Hollywood' flik. It's not truely centred around the comics but 'hey' its the 21st Century and this is a moderm spin on a novel story. The CGI & storyline are of a greater quality & the storyline is (if possible) more realistic!
Andy Appleby, Redcar, Cleveland
I believe this review of the film to be both harsh and unfair. As somebody who has grown up watching the cartoons, but not reading the comics, I found this film to be overall very good, albeit a bit drawn out in the beginning, and definatly worth watching if you are a true fan of the hulk.
Theodor, London, United Kingdom
I think Wendy's spot on; it had none of the charm of Iron Man and Norton's performance as Banner was totally uncharismatic. It passed a couple of hours, but that's all.
David, London, England
Very harsh review, I enjoyed it, it had a nice mix of ingredients, the effects were very good and it had some funny cameos. Its the best of the summer blockbusters ive seen so far this year, far more entertaining than Indy thats for sure.
Benny, London, UK
Wendy needs an ice cream to cool down.
Arthur, London, England,
A bit harsh.
Love Films, Birmingham, England